From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Reply-To: josh@agliodbs.com
Organization: Aglio Database Solutions
To: "Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Subject: Re: Databasing sponsors
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:02:25 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org,
 "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
References: <20080403101150.56301a10@commandprompt.com>
	<200804041127.02090.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<937d27e10804041147h20040dc9jb637647a1e0261ff@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <937d27e10804041147h20040dc9jb637647a1e0261ff@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200804041702.26906.josh@agliodbs.com>

Dave,

> What does it have to do with SPI, JPUG or Fr (as groups, not the
> individuals in them)?

Because at the time those were our only fundraising vehicles.  It was also 
an open session and several people not in any of those orgs attended.

Now, of course, we'd need to pull in PGUS, PGEU, and PostgreSQL.Br.  
However, I stand by the idea that the donor schema from then is still 
basically OK and we can put it up and then incrementally improve it.  If 
we try for the 100% perfect donor listings, then it'll just be the website 
redesign all over again.

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco