Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CB12E002F for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 23:36:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93866-07 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 23:36:32 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651652E0056 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 23:36:32 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id m352aTY00979; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 22:36:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200804050236.m352aTY00979@momjian.us> Subject: Re: Patch queue -> wiki In-Reply-To: <27307.1207361987@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: Tom Lane Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 22:36:29 -0400 (EDT) CC: Gregory Stark , Alvaro Herrera , Greg Smith , Pg Hackers X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200804/318 X-Sequence-Number: 116411 Tom Lane wrote: > Gregory Stark writes: > > "Bruce Momjian" writes: > >> Basically a Wiki takes 10x more time for me to modify something, so > >> unless I get another 9 people to do the same amount of work I do on > >> tracking, we are going to fall behind. I am not willing to increase the > >> amount of time I already spend doing this. Perhaps distributed over the > >> community there will be 9x more time spent on tracking, but I doubt it. > > > On a busy day we might get 5 patches submitted or updated. That's five lines > > of text to add or edit. > > I think what Bruce is really complaining about here is that he's got > years worth of development in his current infrastructure, and so it only > costs him a few seconds and keystrokes to push stuff into his existing > patch queue; while there's no such shortcuts for the wiki. Which is a > fair complaint, but it's hardly insoluble. My infrastructure really took no time to construct because it is just pushing email around. I don't care if I have to scrap it. Basically it is an outgrowth of something I already do, and that is read the email stream. My guess is that no matter what we set up I am going to want to track things others don't want to see so I am still going to have my private list of emails I want to address. That private email list has grown into something official because I am more thorough about it than most. If the community wants a more collaborative tool, they can create one or ask for additions to my web pages. If I need to take my pages offline to help, fine. If the new system is 10x harder than I what I do now, I will probably just keep doing what I am doing and just not make it visible. I can put some work into using the collaborative tool, but as I said before, we are going to need another 9x of effort. Personally I don't think either the March or May wiki pages are accurate enough, so that isn't a good sign. FYI, others can add to the patch queue now; the email address is at the top of each page. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +