Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A5A2E006B for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 16:12:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44969-03 for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 16:12:16 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 888A22E006A for ; Wed, 7 May 2008 16:12:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 May 2008 19:12:15 -0000 Received: from xdsl-195-14-202-110.netcologne.de (EHLO colt.pezone.net) [195.14.202.110] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 07 May 2008 21:12:15 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+v6KpseoGvqPoR0+z+xCYpqak9QNHIcHhuZ5MtUo 3V7aOtndMwEwre From: Peter Eisentraut To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 21:12:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Tom Lane , "Matthew T. O'connor" , Alex Hunsaker , Bruce Momjian , Brendan Jurd References: <34d269d40805070752g4d578a1fu6acb00fd8e5f774e@mail.gmail.com> <4821D0A0.8040305@zeut.net> <8588.1210177204@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <8588.1210177204@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200805072112.11546.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200805/186 X-Sequence-Number: 118185 Tom Lane wrote: > Personally I'd be fine with abandoning -patches and just using -hackers. > We could try it for awhile, anyway, and go back if it seems worse. I'd be good with that. The split never made much sense for me.