Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CA72E003E for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:12:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82571-08 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:12:09 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from fetter.org (start.fetter.org [66.92.188.65]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E815A2E0032 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:12:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: by fetter.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 51E15FBCFB7; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:12:11 -0700 From: David Fetter To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: Magnus Hagander , Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Git access? Message-ID: <20080610221211.GG15591@fetter.org> References: <20080605155258.GF21648@fetter.org> <200806061354.43916.peter_e@gmx.net> <20080610191013.GC15591@fetter.org> <484ED29B.5070706@hagander.net> <20080610220032.GF15591@fetter.org> <1213135511.17340.172.camel@jd-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1213135511.17340.172.camel@jd-laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200806/67 X-Sequence-Number: 15294 On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 03:05:11PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 15:00 -0700, David Fetter wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:14:35PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > > It's an interesting plan, but it's one that's preventing people > > > > from using the service. How about shelving that plan for the > > > > moment and handing out access as needed to developers? :) > > > > > > Please don't. Handing more access out in an uncontrolled way will > > > give us a lot more work cleaning things up later. > > > > With respect, I must disagree. This resource is incredibly easy to > > maintain--and practically useless--because nobody can get on there. > > I think the point is, we don't want to give shell accounts out. Which is > why we are waiting. That is something I can get behind. We don't need to > be handing out yet more shell accounts. Why not? They can be revoked any time. Meanwhile, people's inability to use them is costing us. People are hosting projects outside our system, not because they don't like our system, but because they can't get a workable SCM from pgfoundry or anywhere else inside our system. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate