Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:06:37 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>
To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Archived-At message header
Message-ID: <20080618140636.GF433@commandprompt.com>
References: <20080618135104.GC433@commandprompt.com>
	<48591428.4060709@hagander.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <48591428.4060709@hagander.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 03:56:56PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> 
> Can't we do this already, since our archives can be accessed by messageid?

We do, approximately.  The cool trick about this is that it's a
_message_ header, so it actually comes with the message.  The RFC
includes a pointer to w3c code that will generate these headers on the
way by based on Message-ID, yes.  

I guess what I was thinking is that the threading-across-month issue
could be solved by using these headers as the basis for building the
thread back up.  Maybe it's a dumb idea, though.  (Nobody would accuse
me of never having dumb ideas in public.)

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@commandprompt.com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/