Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:20:04 -0400
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Archived-At message header
Message-ID: <20080618142003.GD5077@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <20080618135104.GC433@commandprompt.com>
	<48591428.4060709@hagander.net>
	<20080618140636.GF433@commandprompt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080618140636.GF433@commandprompt.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> I guess what I was thinking is that the threading-across-month issue
> could be solved by using these headers as the basis for building the
> thread back up.  Maybe it's a dumb idea, though.  (Nobody would accuse
> me of never having dumb ideas in public.)

I've also thought about this in the past.  I don't think it's a dumb
idea -- perhaps it can be made to work.  I'm hesitant to continue to
build kluges on top of Mhonarc, though.  (I tried to get Abhijit
Menon-Sen interested in exploring the idea of using Archivopteryx to
drive our archives, but he seems to have even less time for
experimentation with such things than I do.)

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support