Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33F8650EA6 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:26:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27232-02 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:26:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82566650E2E for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:26:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6B4168C584 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:26:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24719-08; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:26:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-224-204-104.eastlink.ca [24.224.204.104]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 43723168C39C; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:26:24 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6526F4131D; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:26:28 -0300 (ADT) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:26:28 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= cc: Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL - WWW ML Subject: Re: Removal of the patches email list In-Reply-To: <1214569314.20723.123.camel@laptop.gunduz.org> Message-ID: <20080627092525.S69138@fserv.hub.org> References: <200806262251.m5QMpkQ18732@momjian.us> <1214569314.20723.123.camel@laptop.gunduz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Archive-Number: 200806/189 X-Sequence-Number: 15416 On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Devrim G=DCND=DCZ wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 18:51 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> We have come to agreement > > Who are "we" ? Just wondering. I had the same question, but figured it was only because I hadn't gotten=20 into one of the more long term threads and missed this part of it ... it=20 wasn't discussedon -core either, nor was any mention of the idea made=20 there ... ... not that I'm against removing it ...