Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CAD650E82 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 14:02:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85473-06 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 14:02:21 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net (vms173001pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.1]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68EE764FD64 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 14:02:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ridley.home ([71.179.5.175]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K3F009F6WNTKUQ4@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:02:17 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:02:16 -0400 From: Robert Treat Subject: Re: Proposal to remove some mailing lists In-reply-to: <1215100630.6936.11.camel@jd-laptop> To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, rod@iol.ie Message-id: <200807031302.16464.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <200807021849.03869.peter_e@gmx.net> <200807031146.06945.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <1215100630.6936.11.camel@jd-laptop> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200807/14 X-Sequence-Number: 15444 On Thursday 03 July 2008 11:57:10 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 11:46 -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > > On Thursday 03 July 2008 06:24:16 Raymond O'Donnell wrote: > > > On 02/07/2008 17:49, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > > +1. While the questions on that list due tend to be pretty on-topic, they > > would be equally fine asked on -general, and probably answered more > > quickly as well. > > Except that General is an extremely active list and may cause those > subscribed to pgsql-php to unsubscribe. Topic specific lists are good. > > If we want to get rid of pgsql-php lets do it for something at least > directional, say pgsql-webdev a list dedicated to web developers using > PostgreSQL. > This presumes one only uses php for web development... really it can be used for scripting and gui applications as well. Heck, I even heard of some company trying to use it for database procedural work. More on point, why would you seperate web developer questions from other questions? And how? Not being able to connect to postgres from a webserver is pretty much the same issue as not connecting from anything else. Or what about someone using dbd:pg from a script, vs. someone using it to write a cgi? *shrug* I'm subscribed to both, so it doesnt affect me much, but I don't see much benefit to having that list as it stands now (and the traffic is pretty low anyway) -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL