Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8E0650EBF for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:07:36 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11158-01 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:07:28 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net (vms173003pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.3]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0921D650E8F for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:07:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from ridley.home ([71.179.5.175]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K3G007DE2G1Q76H@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:07:14 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:07:12 -0400 From: Robert Treat Subject: Re: Proposal to remove some mailing lists In-reply-to: <1215106061.6936.26.camel@jd-laptop> To: "Joshua D. Drake" Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, rod@iol.ie Message-id: <200807031507.12705.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline References: <200807021849.03869.peter_e@gmx.net> <200807031302.16464.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <1215106061.6936.26.camel@jd-laptop> User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200807/21 X-Sequence-Number: 15451 On Thursday 03 July 2008 13:27:41 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 13:02 -0400, Robert Treat wrote: > > More on point, why would you seperate web developer questions from other > > questions? And how? Not being able to connect to postgres from a > > webserver is pretty much the same issue as not connecting from anything > > else. Or what about someone using dbd:pg from a script, vs. someone using > > it to write a cgi? > > > > *shrug* > > How do I do X with ORM Y and why does PostgreSQL react with Z. > > People on general may or may not care. People on wwwdev may. PHP developers won't care how you would access something via activerecord any more on a -wwwdev list than they would on -general. > > > I'm subscribed to both, so it doesnt affect me much, but I don't see much > > benefit to having that list as it stands now (and the traffic is pretty > > low anyway) > > I am not arguing that we should keep pgsql-php as much as the idea of > dumping people on to general which imo is abused way to much as it is. > AFAICT, you are currently arguing specifically over whether pgsql-php should be included along with the other lists in Peters proposal. If what you're really objecting to is Peter's overall proposal that dumping people from -ports, -cygwin, and -interfaces back onto -general is a problem, please restate your argument in that wider scope. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL