Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075CB650EB9 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:08:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66093-04 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:08:04 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A061650E9E for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:08:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (190-95-31-93.bk17-dsl.surnet.cl [190.95.31.93]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m63K9khs011108 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:10:00 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5E76F47C7C; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:07:35 -0400 (CLT) Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:07:35 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Tom Lane Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , Robert Treat , pgsql-www@postgresql.org, rod@iol.ie Subject: Re: Proposal to remove some mailing lists Message-ID: <20080703200735.GC18252@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <200807021849.03869.peter_e@gmx.net> <200807031302.16464.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <1215106061.6936.26.camel@jd-laptop> <200807031507.12705.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> <1215112207.6936.47.camel@jd-laptop> <6506.1215114285@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6506.1215114285@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:10:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200807/24 X-Sequence-Number: 15454 Tom Lane wrote: > I think the general feeling (at least at the developer meeting where > this was discussed) is that we've erred too far in the second direction > and need to pull back a bit. Let me remind that there was no one against this idea of removing certain lists (and there was plenty of people there.) -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.