Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A771565087B for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:15:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82298-02-8 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:15:31 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA10650F64 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:09:30 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id m6GF9RO14179; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:09:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <200807161509.m6GF9RO14179@momjian.us> Subject: Re: Spam filtering on the mailing lists In-Reply-To: <4513abe44c17558a70a1a824f877d217@biglumber.com> To: Greg Sabino Mullane Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:09:27 -0400 (EDT) CC: pgsql-www@postgresql.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200807/95 X-Sequence-Number: 15525 Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > I'd like to reiterate my request for some (or better?) spam filtering on > the lists. I just rejected over 50 messages to pgsql-bugs, all of them > spam and 95% of them would be easily caught by the worst spam filter > on the market. The chance of the moderators mistakenly rejecting a > legitimate message increases as the volume of spam does. If this is > something the project cannot handle for technical/political reasons, > there are plenty of third-party spam filtering solutions out there, > some of which are using Postgres and would probably be happy to provide > the service to us. I am confused --- we have no spam filter for the bugs list? -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +