Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:15:56 -0400
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Spam filtering on the mailing lists
Message-ID: <20080717181556.GM3934@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <200807161509.m6GF9RO14179@momjian.us>
	<1216227673.28961.139.camel@jd-laptop>
	<20080716180738.GF5758@commandprompt.com>
	<8C1E1C3655705FB9706E2E10@ganymede.hub.org>
	<20080717124653.GB6732@commandprompt.com>
	<20080717124111.P69138@fserv.hub.org>
	<20080717155428.GE3934@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<20080717150757.M69138@fserv.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080717150757.M69138@fserv.hub.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

>> Hmm, I think keeping it at 5 is a good idea, seeing how 2 of those were
>> being substracted by the AWL and you've just cleared that.
>>
>> Maybe what we need is a way to remove a particular domain from the AWL
>> instead?
>
> Actually, I was thinking of disabling the AWL feature altogether ... it  
> might make a few extra false-positives to need to release, but I doubt it 
> will make a huge difference ...

I think that's a bad idea because it'll delay all email.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.