Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4180965040A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:21:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35538-02-4 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:21:33 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1246B6506D0 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:47:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (190-95-31-93.bk17-dsl.surnet.cl [190.95.31.93]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6RNnUdh029225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:49:33 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4B42E47C86; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:46:57 -0400 (CLT) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:46:57 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Tom Lane Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" , Andrew Sullivan , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Insecure DNS servers on PG infrastructure Message-ID: <20080727234657.GB8636@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <26210.1216998123@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20080725154048.GE29775@commandprompt.com> <572.1217018672@sss.pgh.pa.us> <488CBFB6.6000207@commandprompt.com> <16605.1217184746@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16605.1217184746@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:49:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200807/139 X-Sequence-Number: 15569 Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" writes: > > Tom can you check if this has been resolved? If not I am going to start > > paging people. > > The machines I have access to (cvs and svr1) are still unpatched > according to the "dig porttest" test. Personally, though, I'd be > more interested in getting someone to work on fixing the mailing > lists. I've received nothing since about midnight EDT, and I know > that there has been traffic. Maybe the mail servers have been DDoS'ed again? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.