Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969FA64FCFE
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:20:40 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 95503-09 for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:20:33 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6999B64FCCF
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:20:33 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id
 m7MJKUo01635;
	Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:20:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Message-Id: <200808221920.m7MJKUo01635@momjian.us>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4279: Bad codepage in our
 web-site
In-Reply-To: <20080822191316.GL4131@commandprompt.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:20:30 -0400 (EDT)
CC: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200808/93
X-Sequence-Number: 15683

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 02:03:49PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >     <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"
> > >     />
> > 
> > You saw that in our CVS HTML file that is part of the source
> > distribution?  That is the master copy.
> 
> No, that's my point.  When I look at the web page source, it's UTF-8.
> And since that's the only realistic way to have the framework document
> around the FAQ, it seems reasonable to me.
> 
> > I see lots of FAQs in CVS that are not UTF8:
> > 
> > 	FAQ.html:    <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=US-ASCII">
> 
> This doesn't matter, because US-ASCII is a proper subset of UTF-8.
> 
> > 	FAQ_brazilian.html:    <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
> 
> This doesn't need to change because the bottom range of Unicode was made
> the same as ISO 8859-1 in order to make the transition somewhat easier.
> 
> > 	FAQ_polish.html:         <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-2">
> > 	FAQ_russian.html:    <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=koi8-r">
> > 	FAQ_turkish.html:       <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso8859-9">
> > 
> > Do they all have to be converted?
> 
> Those three do, I expect.  They sure look like it on the page.  All
> sorts of "?" in there.

Well, something is converting them to UTF8 headings on our web site and
I thought the HTML encoding was converted at that stage.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +