Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228E8650054 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:11:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36576-01 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:10:58 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4797864FFBC for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:11:00 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (200-126-66-230.bk5-dsl.surnet.cl [200.126.66.230]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7TLE1ZK028250 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:14:05 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2083247CA7; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:10:52 -0400 (CLT) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:10:52 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Chander Ganesan Cc: Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Download links Message-ID: <20080829211052.GM3983@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <937d27e10808110203l790a9c3eud97fdde42f70b92f@mail.gmail.com> <48B85DCF.8070206@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <48B85DCF.8070206@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:14:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200808/115 X-Sequence-Number: 15705 Chander Ganesan escribió: > Dave Page wrote: >> The downside is that this may lead to a couple of extra clicks for >> people to find what they need. The upside is that the pages they go to >> will almost certainly have a section for the packages they actually >> want, and should be more simple and easy to understand. >> > I had to spend a bit of time hunting around to find the latest release > of 8.2.x, in fact, it's not really "indicated" anywhere that "old" > versions are there. Looking at the /download page, I cannot find a > single reference to older versions (the big advantage to the old > format). One has to hunt around until they find the "source code" link > to locate an older version of postgresql. There's no usefulness whatsoever to the old versions, so why should they be linked to? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.