Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4D9632D7A for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:02:43 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 70753-09 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:02:40 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AA7632C2D for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:02:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from alvh.no-ip.org ([164.77.102.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1BM8PcA014533 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:08:37 -0800 Received: by alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1E895560095; Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:02:11 -0300 (CLST) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:02:11 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner Cc: Tom Lane , Josh Berkus , Dave Page , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Audio & Video? Message-ID: <20090211220210.GY8924@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <499336C3.4040507@agliodbs.com> <937d27e10902111240hd7e7cc0p8f20fd3b03d989e9@mail.gmail.com> <14215.1234385050@sss.pgh.pa.us> <49933B2C.2030609@agliodbs.com> <49933BC1.30905@kaltenbrunner.cc> <49933E6B.5030401@agliodbs.com> <14942.1234387956@sss.pgh.pa.us> <49934764.2060103@kaltenbrunner.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49934764.2060103@kaltenbrunner.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:08:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200902/56 X-Sequence-Number: 16607 Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> It's probably fair to discuss what is a reasonable space budget for >> audio/video stuff, and maybe to try to prevent it from being mirrored >> if the sysadmins think that would be a good idea. But this doesn't >> strike me as being too large for the servers we've got. > > we have more than enough resources to host stuff like this - the wiki > allows uploads of content of up to 100MB per object (it used to display > a warning for stuff that was larger than 150kb but I just disabled > that). I think the Wiki is not a good place for storing such things. It barely knows that binary files are "images"