Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD76B633AD7;
	Sun,  8 Mar 2009 06:11:22 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 08493-01; Sun,  8 Mar 2009 06:11:01 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sraihb2.sra.co.jp (sraihb2.sra.co.jp [202.32.10.6])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2447633659;
	Sun,  8 Mar 2009 06:10:59 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from srascd.sra.co.jp (srascd [133.137.8.67])
	by sraihb2.sra.co.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id BCD1F2A165A;
	Sun,  8 Mar 2009 18:10:56 +0900 (JST)
Received: from (srascb.sra.co.jp [133.137.8.65]) by srascd.sra.co.jp with smtp
	id 3027_08161a98_0bc1_11de_8b56_001d096c5d65;
	Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:10:55 +0900
Received: from sranhm.sra.co.jp (sranhm [133.137.16.38])
	by srascb.sra.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA652110C71;
	Sun,  8 Mar 2009 18:10:55 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (sraihb-hub.sra.co.jp [133.137.8.6])
	by sranhm.sra.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74FB58080;
	Sun,  8 Mar 2009 18:10:55 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:10:45 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20090308.181045.94096844.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
To: stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: the sad state of our FAQs
From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <49B38387.8030804@kaltenbrunner.cc>
References: <49B27F0E.2050504@kaltenbrunner.cc>
	<20090308.165101.27803556.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp>
	<49B38387.8030804@kaltenbrunner.cc>
X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0
	=?iso-2022-jp?B?KBskQjgtTFobKEIp?=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.119 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.119
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200903/41
X-Sequence-Number: 16695

> > If you are suggesting that you remove well-maintained localized FAQs
> > together, then I against it. We should remove unmaintained localized
> > FAQs first IMO.
> 
> I was just suggesting moving all of them them and only link to those 
> that are reasonably well maintained.
> So for a well maintained faq like the japanese one the only thing that 
> would change is that you can translate it directly in the wiki instead 
> of sending a patch to bruce.

I don't know if Japanese FAQ maintainer would gladly do the
reformatting work to upload to Wiki. Does anyone have a script to
translate from HTML to Wiki?
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan