Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56F46336CA; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:39:23 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08258-10; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:39:18 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB33663343C; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:39:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (200-126-101-194.bk7-dsl.surnet.cl [200.126.101.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2HJjsQM020721 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:45:56 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6DB4947CDF; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:39:08 -0400 (CLT) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:39:08 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner Cc: Tom Lane , Brendan Jurd , PostgreSQL www , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [DOCS] the sad state of our FAQs Message-ID: <20090317193908.GJ4202@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <49B27F0E.2050504@kaltenbrunner.cc> <20090307195305.GB3821@alvh.no-ip.org> <18162.1236463457@sss.pgh.pa.us> <37ed240d0903071418u541851f8pac6cb16fe48e859d@mail.gmail.com> <18473.1236465193@sss.pgh.pa.us> <49B387A1.7090708@kaltenbrunner.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <49B387A1.7090708@kaltenbrunner.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:45:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200903/115 X-Sequence-Number: 16769 Stefan Kaltenbrunner escribió: > So maybe the current FAQ needs an overhaul in the sense of reducing it > to a much smaller number of things in the main FAQ and replacing the > rest of the things with something that provides much easier access to > the available resources(which I frankly think the search and the wiki > already does so people are not actually reading the FAQs any more). Okay, so the FAQ is now on the Wiki. Is anybody actually going to work on overhauling it? I'm also wondering why do we have two pages, FAQ and Frequently_Asked_Questions. Shouldn't they be merged? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support