Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E7E63449D for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:33:47 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19072-01 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:33:43 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sraihb2.sra.co.jp (sraihb2.sra.co.jp [202.32.10.6]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920CD632B28 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:33:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from srascd.sra.co.jp (srascd [133.137.8.67]) by sraihb2.sra.co.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id 05BF92A1619 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:33:18 +0900 (JST) Received: from (srascb.sra.co.jp [133.137.8.65]) by srascd.sra.co.jp with smtp id 1599_85beac9a_136d_11de_8308_001d096c5d65; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:33:18 +0900 Received: from sranhm.sra.co.jp (sranhm [133.137.16.38]) by srascb.sra.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA96110C74 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:33:18 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (dhcp-17-221.sra.co.jp [133.137.17.221]) by sranhm.sra.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA51A5806F; Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:33:17 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:33:16 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20090318.123316.45181164.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp> To: gsmith@gregsmith.com Cc: bruce@momjian.us, scrappy@hub.org, alvherre@commandprompt.com, david@dawninglight.net, pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: List Message Footer From: Tatsuo Ishii In-Reply-To: References: <200903180210.n2I2AQP09168@momjian.us> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 =?iso-2022-jp?B?KBskQjgtTFobKEIp?= Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200903/126 X-Sequence-Number: 16780 > > I think the footer is full enough and I just don't see enough demand for > > URL lookups to warrant it. > > You could make an argument that anything that makes the whole mailing > list/Commitfest interface easier is worthwhile to implement even if there > isn't much demand outside of that context. > > In addition to that, I know I regularly come across messages in the > archives via web searching that lead me to list aggregators like MarkMail, > and since the message ID can't always be found at those it's painful to > then track that back to where they were in the archives in order to get a > permanent URL. This proposal won't fix that for the old messages already > over there, but those will decrease in proportion moving forward. > Probably increase visibility to using the archives too. +1. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan