Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF66634639 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:24:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18989-07 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:24:42 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07A296322E3 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:24:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2009 06:24:42 -0000 Received: from a91-154-107-53.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO vanquo.pezone.net) [91.154.107.53] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 26 Mar 2009 07:24:42 +0100 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/kMOtpEWPkdFERbEdxZtx7NAfzV+/3K7L3XCT4cp /+PUfhpYDMRIW5 From: Peter Eisentraut To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: shut down pgsql-interfaces (was Re: [HACKERS] Function C and INOUT parameters) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:24:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.26-1-686; KDE/4.2.1; i686; ; ) Cc: Tom Lane , Alvaro Herrera , Josh Berkus , Greg Stark , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, "Marc G. Fournier" References: <665164.63021.qm@web28512.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <20090325215052.GB3137@alvh.no-ip.org> <19607.1238018106@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <19607.1238018106@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200903260824.38777.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.6899999999999999 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.07 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.070 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200903/194 X-Sequence-Number: 16848 On Wednesday 25 March 2009 23:55:06 Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera writes: > > Josh Berkus wrote: > >> That was 6 months ago. I doubt anyone remembers it. Make another > >> announcement, so that when people get the "unsubscribed" announcement, > >> they're not confused. > > > > Done. > > BTW, what was the reason we didn't pull the trigger before, when we > retired the other lists? Just an oversight? Because the same people who complained just now complained back then as well. So we retired the lists without objections first.