Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0876336AE for ; Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:17:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67584-02 for ; Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:16:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160266328FF for ; Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:16:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCCF53BC65 for ; Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:16:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67244-05; Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:16:54 -0300 (ADT) Received: by hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 1BB7953BC45; Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:16:55 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A87153BC36; Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:16:55 -0300 (ADT) Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:16:54 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Josh Berkus cc: PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: sponsors@ mailing list broken? In-Reply-To: <49D7F358.2090608@agliodbs.com> Message-ID: <20090405001546.X46680@hub.org> References: <49D58363.5090806@agliodbs.com> <20090403012922.W46680@hub.org> <49D7F358.2090608@agliodbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200904/14 X-Sequence-Number: 16881 should be fixed, out of sync recipients file, just updated all mx's to have the same as the master ... let me know of anything like this in the future .. there is a script in ~majordomo/lists/ALIASES that has to be run as root whenever a list is added, that will sync out the virtuals file ... On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 4/2/09 9:29 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> What do the bounce messages look like? Nothing has changed on the >> server, else it would affect all lists ... one list shouldn't be singled >> out ... > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- > > (reason: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: > User unknown in relay recipient table) > > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- > ... while talking to mail.postgresql.org.: >>>> >>> DATA > <<< 450 4.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: > Greylisted for 5 minutes > ... Deferred: 450 4.7.1 : > Recipient address rejected: Greylisted for 5 minutes > <<< 554 5.5.1 Error: no valid recipients > ... while talking to mx1.hub.org.: >>>> >>> DATA > <<< 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User > unknown in relay recipient table > 550 5.1.1 ... User unknown > <<< 554 5.5.1 Error: no valid recipients > > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664