Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13DB63419E for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:54:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35608-09 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:54:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32EB634092 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:54:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD03253BC7C for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:54:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35836-10; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:54:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: by hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 4E9B353BC5B; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:54:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D41953BC3F; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:54:15 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:54:15 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Dave Page cc: Alvaro Herrera , Bruce Momjian , Tom Lane , PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: Archives policy In-Reply-To: <937d27e10904160827r19c50f2fg79a552fdaae96836@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090416135324.U84471@hub.org> References: <16454.1239890476@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200904161454.n3GEsxm27869@momjian.us> <937d27e10904160808w21a2ebbcs57136807df000680@mail.gmail.com> <20090416151427.GW7709@alvh.no-ip.org> <937d27e10904160827r19c50f2fg79a552fdaae96836@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200904/76 X-Sequence-Number: 16943 On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Dave Page wrote: > Yeah, thanks for raising that! If we catch inappropriate messages almost > immediately, it should just be a case of stopping mhonarc from running > and deleting the messages from the mbox file. If they've been there are > while (and renumbering messages will be a problem) Isn't that why Alvaro(?) went through all that work getting it so that we could reference messages by MessageID? To remove the worry concerning renumbering? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664