Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D5E6327D1 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:14:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32022-03 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:14:50 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB25C632542 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:14:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (200-126-99-132.bk7-dsl.surnet.cl [200.126.99.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3GFLkCK018317 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:21:50 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8297D47C85; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:14:27 -0400 (CLT) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:14:27 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Dave Page Cc: Bruce Momjian , Tom Lane , PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: Archives policy Message-ID: <20090416151427.GW7709@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <16454.1239890476@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200904161454.n3GEsxm27869@momjian.us> <937d27e10904160808w21a2ebbcs57136807df000680@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <937d27e10904160808w21a2ebbcs57136807df000680@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:21:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.693 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY=1.693 X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200904/74 X-Sequence-Number: 16941 Dave Page wrote: > OK, well I've removed the bit about removing illegal/unwanted > material. FWIW, we *will* remove such unwanted content, otherwise we > could easily become an online archive for pr0n/warez etc. which will > certainly not do our reputation any good. Now that you've hashed that out, would you explain *how* would you actually remove the posts? It requires editing the majordomo archive store, but I don't think many people has access to that ... I know I don't for one (and I keep wondering why, seeing how I am the de facto archives maintainer). -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support