Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04A563538A for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:50:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99053-05-3 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:50:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA647635358 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:50:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C261553BC74 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:50:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 98912-07; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:50:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: by hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 36E0353BC5E; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:50:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357DD53BC5A; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:50:41 -0300 (ADT) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:50:41 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Tom Lane cc: Alvaro Herrera , Dave Page , Bruce Momjian , PostgreSQL www Subject: Re: Archives policy In-Reply-To: <27966.1239908638@sss.pgh.pa.us> Message-ID: <20090416175006.G84471@hub.org> References: <16454.1239890476@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200904161454.n3GEsxm27869@momjian.us> <937d27e10904160808w21a2ebbcs57136807df000680@mail.gmail.com> <20090416151427.GW7709@alvh.no-ip.org> <937d27e10904160827r19c50f2fg79a552fdaae96836@mail.gmail.com> <20090416135324.U84471@hub.org> <20090416165800.GY7709@alvh.no-ip.org> <20090416155223.N84471@hub.org> <27966.1239908638@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200904/95 X-Sequence-Number: 16962 On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" writes: >> On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> (and I don't think we're going to attempt to delete pornographic >>> messages posted months ago -- if anything of the sort happens, action is >>> going to be taken pretty hastily). > >> Agreed ... there isn't any reason why someone 'internally' doesn't notice >> it from jus scanning the lists ... > > I think by far the most likely problem scenario is that someone claims > to hold copyright on something-or-other in an old message and files a > DMCA takedown notice against it. AFAICT the standard of proof in such > cases is "guilty until proven innocent", so we'd probably have to cave > rather than argue about it. How are the copyright laws in Canada these > days? All things considered, consider Canada the 53rd state ... (you guys have 52, right?) ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664