Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC0A634FEA for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:36:52 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 58086-01 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:36:44 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F697633487 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:36:43 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2009 18:30:00 -0000 Received: from a91-154-107-53.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO vanquo.pezone.net) [91.154.107.53] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 16 Apr 2009 20:30:00 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18u+Yc2JzEuDQ3XjBt2i+X7gBNVERPlEzUql3Km7u l614nszZJv/rnW From: Peter Eisentraut To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Archives policy Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:29:45 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.26-2-686; KDE/4.2.2; i686; ; ) Cc: Dave Page References: <937d27e10904160107t6406b64cxddec956619c3374@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <937d27e10904160107t6406b64cxddec956619c3374@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904162129.46832.peter_e@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.7 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200904/85 X-Sequence-Number: 16952 On Thursday 16 April 2009 11:07:05 Dave Page wrote: > Can I get comments/objections/opinions on this draft policy please? > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Archives_Policy Altogether that page now reads like, our archiving system is too stupid to handle removals and we are too busy to bother. Not sure if that will serve to convince people. "Extremely difficult" is after all the same as "possible".