Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620D7420B3E
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Wed,  1 Feb 2012 19:30:15 -0400 (AST)
Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bruce@momjian.us>) id 1Rsjd1-0005dO-6H
	for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:30:16 +0000
Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bruce@momjian.us>)
	id 1Rsjck-00045f-S8; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:29:58 -0500
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:29:58 -0500
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>,
	Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Planet posting policy
Message-ID: <20120201232958.GA15418@momjian.us>
References: 
 <CABUevEzWPnYr7PW6+GLh8Q6S+PvPi-7GKipE8ZuLPLRQKBLf_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F26DA5D.7040808@agliodbs.com>
	<CA+OCxoxC8nAKRYhx2ALS93c6CrHUm5RsAEzu0g6bqQAiwC_usg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABUevEzGnUmrqwc-pvR7HQcjq5PnT42rqiTNLfXhqn_cEtJS6Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+OCxoxt82ExpBxfa_yYm=eMKvZqsazNsQxPnad8YZ1abMUy7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F297F6C.7050007@commandprompt.com>
	<CABUevExrynqmYY_+FNd49wNX3ypgUrovr3Fuku5FYbpmWn1Rdw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F298AEB.1090402@commandprompt.com>
	<20120201220452.GA5191@momjian.us>
	<4F29B98B.6020707@commandprompt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4F29B98B.6020707@commandprompt.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Archive-Number: 201202/12
X-Sequence-Number: 20495

On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:15:39PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
> On 02/01/2012 02:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> >If I was sure that commercial content would be posted with the same
> >regularity and motivation as our current content, I would be fine, but
> >knowing companies, I doubt that is true.
> >
> >I can imagine company X saying, "Oh, we have a new product coming out
> >--- we need a blog campaign around that."  I am afraid that isn't going
> >to be pretty.
> 
> I would agree with that and I am not suggesting we allow press
> releases or advertising etc... However, I do think relevant
> technical information on a product is useful.

Well, as you can see, I am arguing both points, so I am more shooting
out possible ideas rather than having a clear goal myself.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +