Received: from magus.postgresql.org (magus.postgresql.org [87.238.57.229]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31680BF6A45 for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 18:07:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPglY-0001vO-3D for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Wed, 02 May 2012 21:07:17 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SPglD-0002LS-Rb; Wed, 02 May 2012 17:06:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 17:06:55 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Tom Lane Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner , Alvaro Herrera , Magnus Hagander , Greg Sabino Mullane , w^3 Subject: Re: Stopping link spam on the lists Message-ID: <20120502210655.GD8084@momjian.us> References: <16170.1333746317@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1333845038-sup-6474@alvh.no-ip.org> <14092.1333854897@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4F85D024.6020509@kaltenbrunner.cc> <28986.1334170748@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <28986.1334170748@sss.pgh.pa.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201205/2 X-Sequence-Number: 20627 On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:59:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Actually, the only reason I'm complaining is that the PG lists are so > well filtered that I do no additional filtering here. If I were to let > loose my normal spam filters on the list traffic, I'd never see these > (nor, I fear, a lot of valid traffic). So this is the price of success: > people expect perfection ;-) That is true for me as well --- all email from the postgresql.org servers is white-listed on my server. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +