Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E792BC83CB2
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:30:21 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45])
	by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bruce@momjian.us>) id 1SofCW-0003YJ-Gm
	for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:30:21 +0000
Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bruce@momjian.us>)
	id 1SofC9-0002cO-1W; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:29:57 -0400
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:29:57 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>,
	Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>,
	Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>,
	Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
	w^3 <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: 9.2beta web issues
Message-ID: <20120710182957.GB31912@momjian.us>
References: 
 <CABUevEybVA7dEeBUekoinBpLn40jWjhYHdhzPJj=f-p1ZYPRgg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1341525030-sup-6100@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<2405.1341528250@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4FF72D24.1010206@kaltenbrunner.cc>
	<CAEYLb_Uycpj6h1f5_1dXquk1c2XOVeSYDaPtKHHWibQbOpXD8w@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FFB67BD.90908@agliodbs.com> <4FFC6AA0.1060903@kaltenbrunner.cc>
	<4FFC6C8E.2060305@agliodbs.com>
	<1341943550-sup-2118@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<4FFC7124.3050700@agliodbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4FFC7124.3050700@agliodbs.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-)
X-Archive-Number: 201207/82
X-Sequence-Number: 20831

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:15:00AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> BTW, I'm mainly interested in preserving the pgsql-testers mailing list
> for future use; I'm still hoping to find time to get a serious volunteer
> QA effort together, in which case it will need a mailing list.  So we
> could kill off pgsql-testers now, but I'll probably just be asking to
> revive it next year if you do.

I have never been a fan of our cycle of "let's try something --- oh,
that didn't work --- let's not tell anyone --- (years later) why is this
here".  I vote we remove it, and in the future, if we decide not to use
something, let's not assume some amazing idea is going to fix it ---
let's just remove it proactively.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +