Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:47:17 -0500
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Training approval policy on pg.org
Message-ID: <20130111044717.GA4624@momjian.us>
References: <50EEA591.3030905@dalibo.info>
	<CAJKUy5jmrAZce3YRDY5HU3JHX=BEveTCt=rN6Ah2nvbLbXb-eA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130110235007.GA30000@momjian.us> <50EF76E9.4090502@agliodbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <50EF76E9.4090502@agliodbs.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org

On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 06:20:25PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
> >> That seems to low, specially for a Platinum Sponsor.
> >> What about 5 per month that will make 15 per quarter just not all of
> >> them at once.
> > 
> > Platinum Sponsor?  What is that?
> > 
> 
> To date, we haven't tied approval polices to sponsor levels.  I wouldn't
> be opposed to doing so, but it's not our current policy.

Wow, we actually give metal designations for community sponsors:

	http://www.postgresql.org/about/sponsors/

I had no idea.  I also agree that tying things to sponsorship might
cause problems.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www