Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7lus-0002SJ-IR for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:03:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7lur-0007GI-VL for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:03:22 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7lur-0007G8-9e; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:03:21 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7lul-0002ZM-QM; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:03:20 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7lua-0007Bt-EX; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:03:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 07:03:04 -0500 From: Bruce Momjian To: Alvaro Herrera Cc: Christoph Berg , Stefan Kaltenbrunner , Josh Berkus , Martin Pitt , Magnus Hagander , PostgreSQL WWW , PostgreSQL in Debian , Tom Lane Subject: Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA Message-ID: <20130219120304.GB20153@momjian.us> References: <20130214122643.GF30046@msgid.df7cb.de> <511D2E58.6010705@agliodbs.com> <511D4E61.5050808@kaltenbrunner.cc> <20130216013854.GD12029@momjian.us> <20130216084421.GA1223@msgid.df7cb.de> <20130216153309.GF12029@momjian.us> <20130216234034.GG12029@momjian.us> <20130217054028.GA6000@alvh.no-ip.org> <20130217121745.GH12029@momjian.us> <20130218020824.GA4691@alvh.no-ip.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130218020824.GA4691@alvh.no-ip.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Mailing-List: pgsql-pkg-debian List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-pkg-debian-owner@postgresql.org On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:08:25PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 02:40:28AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:33:09AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 09:44:22AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > > > > > > Re: Bruce Momjian 2013-02-16 <20130216013854.GD12029@momjian.us> > > > > > > > I don't think "codename" is really good wording here: > > > > > > > > > > > > That's the official Debian/Ubuntu term, though we can certainly use > > > > > > something else if it makes things easier for users. > > > > > > > > > > OK. How do people find their codename? > > > > > > > > OK, I found the answer: > > > > > > > > $ lsb_release --short --codename > > > > squeeze > > > > > > Uhm. > > > > > > $ lsb_release > > > No LSB modules are available. > > > > Uh, that's what I get too. Try it with the arguments I suggested, > > please. > > Oh, what a weird program. Yes, I get "wheezy" with your suggested > options. Adding to this complexity, I just realized that the Ubuntu code names are different from the Debian code names, even though Ubuntu is based on Debian. Fortunately "lsb_release --short --codename" works on both. While most Debian users probably know their code name, I doubt Ubuntu users do. Do we actually create different packages for Debian and Ubuntu? -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-pkg-debian mailing list (pgsql-pkg-debian@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-pkg-debian