Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7pPZ-0002EX-T8 for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:47:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7pPZ-0005Fy-8z for pgsql-pkg-debian@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:47:17 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7pPY-0005Fq-Rh; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:47:16 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7pPT-0006Cr-Mn; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:47:16 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7pPJ-0006Iz-0X; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:47:01 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:47:01 -0500 From: Bruce Momjian To: Martin Pitt Cc: Markus Wanner , Alvaro Herrera , Christoph Berg , Stefan Kaltenbrunner , Josh Berkus , Magnus Hagander , PostgreSQL WWW , PostgreSQL in Debian , Tom Lane Subject: Re: Re: [pgsql-www] We should not transition to apt.postgresql.org until we have a PPA Message-ID: <20130219154701.GA20725@momjian.us> References: <20130216234034.GG12029@momjian.us> <20130217054028.GA6000@alvh.no-ip.org> <20130217121745.GH12029@momjian.us> <20130218020824.GA4691@alvh.no-ip.org> <20130219120304.GB20153@momjian.us> <512379E2.1070806@bluegap.ch> <20130219132022.GC20153@momjian.us> <51237E69.2020903@bluegap.ch> <20130219134431.GD20153@momjian.us> <20130219154118.GG3033@piware.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130219154118.GG3033@piware.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Mailing-List: pgsql-pkg-debian List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-pkg-debian-owner@postgresql.org On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 04:41:18PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Bruce Momjian [2013-02-19 8:44 -0500]: > > I have been running Ubuntu for 5 years and didn't know the code name of > > my release until I had to track a bug report a few months ago. > > Believe it or not, that's actually great to hear :) The code names are > mostly some fun thing for developers to avoid breaking our tongues too > much when we talk about it. But they have never been meant to be > exposed in stable releases. All announcements, web sites, etc. always > say "Ubuntu 12.04", not "Precise Pangolin". > > (I guess that also has something to do with seriousness and marketing, > etc. :-) Specificially, the patch I needed was ported to quetzal, and I had to wait for it to be ported to precise. I saw the names on the "Pending Ubuntu stable release updates" page: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html and in discussions about the patch. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-pkg-debian mailing list (pgsql-pkg-debian@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-pkg-debian