Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:59:18 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Stalled news about ora2pg 11 on pg.org
Message-ID: <20130415195918.GA4602@momjian.us>
References: <516C4833.2050805@dalibo.info>
	<CA+U5nMKRFBp9vhO_+Y4XJpvd00HDn4P0UDyoNDZ77=Bq8fVypg@mail.gmail.com>
	<516C5A96.4020006@agliodbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <516C5A96.4020006@agliodbs.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:52:54PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
> > 2ndQuadrant has experienced significant delays in at least 3 cases
> > also. There is definitely a problem somewhere there.
> 
> The delay is called "volunteer moderators who have day jobs".
> 
> > Perhaps we should make all posts wait the same length of time, to
> > allow reasonable time to decide whether posts are suitable? 72 hours
> > seems like a reasonable time for this.
> 
> Who is going to do this strictly time-limited approving?

So it auto-approves after 72 hours?  I found this proposal vague.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www