Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkWqO-0007n2-E7 for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:18:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkWqL-0004RN-Hw for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:18:05 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkWqL-0004MY-8c for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:18:05 +0000 Received: from mail-qt1-x844.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::844]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkWqD-00040n-QH for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:18:04 +0000 Received: by mail-qt1-x844.google.com with SMTP id t33so15757864qtt.4 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:17:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=2ndquadrant-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=eQ/feTbGB46yUnc7v8LkEspCfnbmqcSbGc/hx9WzGtc=; b=dLYHBm/synNvCDdrQUdXl6WzwQo+qIiIWb1UU7oSx47VGpzHJaqha/t24fORHH5rIr 5UdWihqRuvz5oVdbryhXSD/9mS2NZp9xZIk1Hg81x2OmP3TiZQ9NJ8aRP2rHWLoSiGv2 ixqQo3M9GWtVq+RXVXNJbWFIrZwF2UVMYuR2lPQ3Wy0IHtRY2s832VBN3Qh3hJ6Oy+Cv NP94Kw21OS34uRX9153ATmqfKlufHvAmri8vv6QXZTwMQ8KC8S58SubPv9tNXcBFGENV uBv5YPRwa3c9x+RU+wRW2NMhMWvZGdNUGrb+arBnEDp/tFMnC/jXXjaHQRvXai+cTfnC J4sA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=eQ/feTbGB46yUnc7v8LkEspCfnbmqcSbGc/hx9WzGtc=; b=Eh1S3LnaBFsqZi1KnYf6uov2OeCc3E5erpv0c3Tjy5FPaXeIH1OI4kAC0fsGC5EsVw 3+887AMnU60Cl9iwUgnLybYu4RNHz3fSr9h+y/lXJAk4Re77jCOv1t0y9/br0wwj3bvL PvXJtxD2Jl+b8/soeTHUbg6sVA6TP0+u8xdz4GjPEjE7E+8r040b0iu7ow8jstvKSjcI MawX8IeFf0/z6JWsudfO/xcWo4jcTUtjVMRAVtJzbGJtuDZuI11gnXo0OKEjO+L7CgVR z8q6IGQvp/OsVnWld+Q32XBH7lo7mR4NSJrJDvkaB1AOgHdyT5/iOb9LVbLjwUP31w7L SlYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcg7s+31SZn7e9V7KHcbaEzRlp4toG8g2zfN1Q8l3O2Z8X52bBt WFPQXGicf34zyAvomlDe3fc7KQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4LQxaMaWTQFkWS21tws/u+R1GWHAKbKS7POTlnYb9UENtWt1x4fAZpZ3MS0DPTOfl64kkRUQ== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e8cc:: with SMTP id m12mr16657746qvo.186.1547828275800; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:17:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from alvin.alvh.no-ip.org ([190.121.29.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 186sm27622471qke.10.2019.01.18.08.17.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:17:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CC0C6978; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 13:17:52 -0300 (-03) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 13:17:52 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Stephen Frost Cc: Tom Lane , Magnus Hagander , Dimitri Fontaine , Andres Freund , "Jonathan S. Katz" , PostgreSQL WWW Subject: Re: mailing list redirect for bug numbers? Message-ID: <201901181617.movyyirllj2h@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190118154019.GP2528@tamriel.snowman.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-1013-2c1e88 List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk On 2019-Jan-18, Stephen Frost wrote: > > since copies received via a direct cc: rather than via the list would > > lack the field. (Hence, you're mistaken to claim this would be > > locally searchable.) > > Ok, it's only locally searchable for people who are subscribed to our > mailing lists and keep local copies of the emails they get from our list > server, but isn't that going to cover the vast majority of the people > who are going to be looking in the commit log and trying to find a > matching thread in their local archive..? It doesn't work in that case either if you're CCed and you get the direct copy before the list copy; that one won't have the header. In my case I just deduplicate with formail/reformail and it simply throws the second one away, and I suspect others do likewise. I don't know what does Gmail do. > If we just agree to always use the message-ID of the first message in > the thread when we're closing out a bug, and people are happy with using > message-ID, then I'm not really sure what the bug # is doing for us (and > I see that that question from my prior email wasn't answered). Hmm, sometimes I refer to an intermediate message in a thread, not necessarily the first, when something was discovered in the middle of some discussion. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services