Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mj1CR-0000UL-QP for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:32:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mj1CQ-0005zh-PU for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:32:14 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mj1CQ-0005zY-JM for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:32:14 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mj1CN-0004HY-VY for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:32:14 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mj1CL-0007Ux-M1; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 11:32:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 11:32:09 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: Daniel Gustafsson Cc: Magnus Hagander , PostgreSQL WWW Subject: Re: Notice about EDB downloads Message-ID: <20211105153209.GB19813@momjian.us> References: <33825241-F49E-4EA5-B34D-0DF982914F59@yesql.se> <20211105141244.GA19813@momjian.us> <8AF33DC8-13FF-447D-A92B-D48F69BEC730@yesql.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8AF33DC8-13FF-447D-A92B-D48F69BEC730@yesql.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 04:16:06PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 5 Nov 2021, at 15:12, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Do we have that kind of chart for any other platform downloads? What > > value is the chart providing, considering it looks very similar to the > > EDB download page. Seems the chart is just a maintenance burden with > > little value and should be removed, as suggested above. > > I thint it formalizes the supported OS per release in a way which the EDB page > doesn't, but I don't think it's necessarily the best place to present this > information as anyone interested would have to flip flop back and forth between > the pages while downloading. Removing it might be the best course of action. Can we move some of that detail to the EDB page so we don't need to maintain our own release list? Also, since it looks like 32-bit is only supported for PG 9.6 and 10, can we just mention that on our site and then we don't have to change anything for new releases. (We would need updates when we end-of-live a release.) -- Bruce Momjian https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.