Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 13:35:35 -0600
From: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org, Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
Subject: Re: missing ML messages
Message-ID: <20220109193535.GM14051@telsasoft.com>
References: <20210123025941.GA30285@telsasoft.com>
 <1287447.1611371258@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <20210123031431.GI27167@telsasoft.com>
 <CABUevEyYop_zjaCggv-FNd9HCRyb4D2xmj5+Wf16Xqp_PHFU=g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABUevEyYop_zjaCggv-FNd9HCRyb4D2xmj5+Wf16Xqp_PHFU=g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20220109193535.GM14051%40telsasoft.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 02:37:33PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 4:14 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:07:38PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> writes:
> > > > I noticed that one of my messages never made it to the HTTP page:
> > > > 20210119190720.GL8560@telsasoft.com
> > >
> > > I see it in the archives, and in my local mail folder too.
> > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210119190720.GL8560@telsasoft.com
> >
> > Ok...I must have entered it wrong somehow.
> >
> > So the problem is that it doesn't show up here:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20170907194236.4cefce96%40wp.localdomain
> >
> > Is it because I used two IDs in reply-to headers?
> >
> > In-Reply-To: <CAFiTN-updTo3aB+7vsECHOHpjB23Av5OfgZQrt90Q33gFK-oZQ@mail.gmail.com>
> >         <CAFiTN-utJPbTLQ9i10wT_zmHX=un+RQMB1B1xbkTgrh971vqjw@mail.gmail.com>
> >
> > In mutt, I would've 't'agged two messages, and then ';'-'r' to reply and quote both.
> 
> Yeah, I think that's it. We only parse a single value in the in-reply-to.

I wondered if you've tried to address this ?

+ Chapman Flack, who wrote:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/61C09C1D.5050702@anastigmatix.net
> *seeing that RFC 5322 3.6.4 permits more than one msg-id for in-reply-to,
> crosses fingers to see what PGLister will make of it*

-- 
Justin