Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54FDD9FB353
	for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:19:39 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 24500-04 for <pgsql-www-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:19:36 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D459F991C
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:19:36 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9GHJZNE020543
	for <pgsql-www@postgresql.org>; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:19:35 -0400 (EDT)
To: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Mail setup broken (still/again?) 
In-reply-to: <20071016101330.10647f7d@scratch> 
References: <20071016085209.GD22159@svr2.hagander.net>
	<20071016140750.GF3255@crankycanuck.ca>
	<3509D6C66029EDED469CF3C0@ganymede.hub.org>
	<4714EAE4.6030004@hagander.net>
	<AD91107127233A7818CC3D73@ganymede.hub.org>
	<4714EE66.6020005@hagander.net>
	<8973E293B7A0AA4DC40D2766@ganymede.hub.org>
	<20071016101330.10647f7d@scratch>
Comments: In-reply-to "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
	message dated "Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:13:30 -0700"
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:19:35 -0400
Message-ID: <20542.1192555175@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200710/113
X-Sequence-Number: 12700

> --On Tuesday, October 16, 2007 18:46:28 +0200 Magnus Hagander
> <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>>> 4902 <BritneysBoudreaux@postgresql.org>:
>>> 933 <CarrolljeffreyTyler@postgresql.org>:
>>> 876 <EvanoctagonBall@postgresql.org>:
>>> 863 <ErikasegregatePhipps@postgresql.org>:
>>> 848 <JeremiahanthraciteCurry@postgresql.org>:
>>> 845 <JenniehabitualMeade@postgresql.org>:
>>> 805 <KipmoliereRocha@postgresql.org>:
>>> 801 <GwendolynsolonWeston@postgresql.org>:
>>> 793 <AngeliqueshipwreckZapata@postgresql.org>:
>>> 788 <OlliedaggerJuarez@postgresql.org>:

>> I wonder how the hell they come up with those... I mean, what's the
>> percentage that they exist at all. I can understand those that fake
>> bill@ and joe@ and such addresses, but this...

I've seen a fair amount of spam that has forged return addresses that
look like those.  I'm thinking that spammer A's name-generator has
fooled spammer B's address-harvester ...

			regards, tom lane