X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3189DCAD3; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:12:18 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08314-06; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:12:13 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CD99DCAB1; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 15:12:10 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jAUJC8Y9000212; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:12:08 -0500 (EST) To: Joshua Drake cc: "Jim C. Nasby" , "Joshua D. Drake" , "Psql_General (E-mail)" , PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List Subject: Re: [GENERAL] What is the deal with mailing lists? In-reply-to: References: <438DE0BA.1050705@commandprompt.com> <20051130182200.GH13642@nasby.net> Comments: In-reply-to Joshua Drake message dated "Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:52:05 -0800" Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:12:08 -0500 Message-ID: <211.1133377928@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004] X-Spam-Score: 0.004 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200511/213 X-Sequence-Number: 8928 Joshua Drake writes: >> Anyway, next time you're seeing a delay take a look at the headers and >> see if you can pin down what the bottleneck is. > Thank you for that... except that, I was talking about HOUR[n] delays not 13 > minutes. Yeah, so ... where's the blockage according to your Received: headers? Personally I've been seeing list turnaround on the order of one minute, across all the lists, since Marc fixed whatever he fixed about a week ago (that was before the server changeover). It would seem that the problem is with a forwarder upstream of you ... regards, tom lane