To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] New email list for emergency communications 
In-reply-to: <20080325145735.GB28405@crankycanuck.ca> 
References: <47E7F825.9020902@kaltenbrunner.cc>
	<200803241909.m2OJ9RX08326@momjian.us>
	<20080324192014.GI5484@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<47E82D9D.6040000@dunslane.net>
	<20080325145735.GB28405@crankycanuck.ca>
Comments: In-reply-to Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
	message dated "Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:57:35 -0400"
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:50:34 -0400
Message-ID: <21700.1206460234@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:39:25PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> perusing a mailbox again. We have unfortunately been badly underprepared 
>> for this.

> Surely that there is an emerging consensus to that effect means that it's
> not as unfortunate as it might be?  I seem to recall the original
> announcement suggesting this was an experiment.  I wouldn't expect the first
> couple rounds to go without a hitch; as long as there is procedural
> improvement the next time, that's a good thing, right?

Yeah, we expected to have glitches.  I think we now have a much better
idea what sort of status-tracking support we need for future fests.

			regards, tom lane