X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F0DECD1DD0C; Mon,  1 Mar 2004 06:21:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 02784-05; Mon,  1 Mar 2004 02:21:21 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B926DD1E94A; Mon,  1 Mar 2004 02:21:19 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i216LG28021715;
	Mon, 1 Mar 2004 01:21:17 -0500 (EST)
To: josh@agliodbs.com
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date 
In-reply-to: <200402291211.33958.josh@agliodbs.com> 
References: <200402260912.54001.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<200402271531.14964.josh@agliodbs.com>
	<20040227201416.N7999@cookie.varlena.com>
	<200402291211.33958.josh@agliodbs.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
	message dated "Sun, 29 Feb 2004 12:11:33 -0800"
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 01:21:16 -0500
Message-ID: <21714.1078122076@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200403/4
X-Sequence-Number: 3820

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> C. BZ does not have any PG support in its default branch, and the RH port is 
> currently unmaintained.

I was quite surprised to read this, and I'm sure Dave Lawrence (RH's BZ
maintainer) would be too.  As would be the thousands of people who
regularly use bugzilla.redhat.com.

If you want to reject BZ because you don't like it, fine, but please
don't allege that it's unmaintained or that we'd have to put our own
resources into maintaining it.  There *will* be BZ-on-PG running at Red
Hat for the foreseeable future.  Obviously Dave would like to get the
port folded back upstream, and it looks like that will happen
eventually, but we need not fear being alone in running BZ-on-PG
meanwhile.

			regards, tom lane