Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkF1X-0000FY-4D for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:16:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkF1V-0006w0-R8 for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:16:25 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkEyv-0000OD-OX for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:13:45 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkEyt-0001UO-Hv; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:13:45 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0HLDaXX022664; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:13:36 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Magnus Hagander cc: Stephen Frost , Dimitri Fontaine , Alvaro Herrera , Andres Freund , "Jonathan S. Katz" , PostgreSQL WWW Subject: Re: mailing list redirect for bug numbers? In-reply-to: References: <201901162154.tg6vsmfylacs@alvherre.pgsql> <20190117154202.GH2528@tamriel.snowman.net> <20190117182821.GK2528@tamriel.snowman.net> Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander message dated "Thu, 17 Jan 2019 19:43:04 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <22662.1547759616.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:13:36 -0500 Message-ID: <22663.1547759616@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Magnus Hagander writes: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 7:28 PM Stephen Frost wrote: >> Uhhh, no, the point here was to assign bug numbers for emails to -bugs >> which *don't* go through the bugs form and therefore didn't have the bug >> number info in the message. > Without having the ability to properly merge bugs and to structured cross > referencing and such, I think that's a really bad idea. That's going to > cause more problems than it's fixing. Agreed. If we have bug numbers assigned to messages that aren't bugs, or are replies to bugs, it's just going to be a mess. regards, tom lane