Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gtwEJ-0001Kn-4m for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:13:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gtwEG-0002L0-Pd for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:13:40 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gtwEG-0002Kt-HN for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:13:40 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gtwE9-00021V-FB; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:13:39 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1DFDV8c023228; Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:13:31 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: "Jonathan S. Katz" cc: "pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Release Notes Archive Patch In-reply-to: <751cae66-4d83-5012-94c6-b915bfa03f9e@postgresql.org> References: <751cae66-4d83-5012-94c6-b915bfa03f9e@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to "Jonathan S. Katz" message dated "Wed, 13 Feb 2019 08:46:25 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <23226.1550070811.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 10:13:31 -0500 Message-ID: <23227.1550070811@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk "Jonathan S. Katz" writes: > All of the above are now fixed. Attached is v2 of the patch. I've also > attached a couple of screenshots so you can see how it looks. > IMV this is ready to go, but would like some review and/or additional > testing prior to pushing. The patch doesn't convey a lot to my mind, so I have to ask: exactly what URLs would this present? Does it do anything to respond to Andres' complaint that existing relnote pages will vanish? regards, tom lane