Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kIzCI-00062M-1j for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 19:03:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kIzCH-0008M6-0p for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 19:03:57 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kIzCG-0008Lz-Rf for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 19:03:56 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kIzCE-0004cH-NG for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 19:03:55 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08HJ3k79237181; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:03:46 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Stephen Frost , Magnus Hagander , Andres Freund , Tatsuo Ishii , Dave Page , Dean Rasheed , PostgreSQL WWW Subject: Re: Policy on cross-posting to multiple lists In-reply-to: <20200917184923.GA25665@alvherre.pgsql> References: <20200917184923.GA25665@alvherre.pgsql> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:49:23 -0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <237179.1600369426.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:03:46 -0400 Message-ID: <237180.1600369426@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Alvaro Herrera writes: > BTW now that this is working, I think we should discuss that if person A > cross-posts, and that post is approved, then whenever person B replies > it should also be approved -- surely there's no need to approve the > cross-posting (for the known subset of lists) for each reply. If that can be automated it'd surely make things noticeably less painful. As is, once somebody's started a multi-list thread, the only way to get out of trouble is for someone to remember to remove other lists from a reply ... and even then, if anyone replies to an earlier post, it's a mess all over again. But I didn't realize we had the ability to pre-approve whole threads for this filter? regards, tom lane