Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551D792B8EB for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 19:44:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Smumi-0005B2-AZ for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 22:44:30 +0000 Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q65MiAAN002406; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 18:44:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom Lane To: Alvaro Herrera cc: Magnus Hagander , w^3 , Josh Berkus Subject: Re: 9.2beta web issues In-reply-to: <1341525030-sup-6100@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <28687.1341523141@sss.pgh.pa.us> <29222.1341524488@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1341525030-sup-6100@alvh.no-ip.org> Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera message dated "Thu, 05 Jul 2012 17:52:07 -0400" Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 18:44:10 -0400 Message-ID: <2405.1341528250@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201207/22 X-Sequence-Number: 20771 Alvaro Herrera writes: > That list's traffic seems a bit on the low side -- surely we've had > people testing more recently than September 2011. pgsql-testers is what we're talking about? 9/2011 would be when the last beta phase ended, and after that would have been a period where zero traffic could be expected. Presumably people have forgotten about the special list since then, accounting for the lack of 9.2beta reports in that list. But even before that, the traffic looks darn thin. regards, tom lane