X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4DC32A0C3; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:43:39 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04876-02; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:43:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5882032A07A; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:43:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8UIhUiW024197; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:43:31 -0400 (EDT) To: josh@agliodbs.com Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [#14748606] comp.databases.postgresql hierarchy In-reply-to: <200409301106.36316.josh@agliodbs.com> References: <#14.e10bbe.ec81ac43.415b2125.2@google.trakken.com> <20040930144809.A3407@ganymede.hub.org> <23761.1096567302@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200409301106.36316.josh@agliodbs.com> Comments: In-reply-to Josh Berkus message dated "Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:06:36 -0700" Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:43:30 -0400 Message-ID: <24196.1096569810@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/314 X-Sequence-Number: 5384 Josh Berkus writes: > BTW, how would we go about organizing a legitimacy vote? Who votes on this? I haven't paid attention to that stuff in nigh ten years, but there is/was a very well-defined procedure to go through to propose a new recognized newsgroup, and at least one newsgroup that deals solely in processing such proposals. Google for "newgroup vote" or some such and you'll probably find all the details you could want. regards, tom lane