X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888DC9DC835;
	Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:50:06 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 24337-08; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:50:05 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A4B9DC810;
	Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:50:03 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0H4o3Fu024298;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:50:03 -0500 (EST)
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgsql-committers shouldn't be the default "developers" list 
In-reply-to: <20060117003636.N28752@ganymede.hub.org> 
References: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40103D7C2@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
	<9811.1137433999@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20060116150320.U28752@ganymede.hub.org>
	<17122.1137438665@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20060116151717.N28752@ganymede.hub.org>
	<17388.1137440193@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20060116155450.N28752@ganymede.hub.org>
	<24141.1137472287@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20060117003636.N28752@ganymede.hub.org>
Comments: In-reply-to "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
	message dated "Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:37:14 -0400"
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:50:03 -0500
Message-ID: <24297.1137473403@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.089 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.089]
X-Spam-Score: 0.089
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200601/196
X-Sequence-Number: 9384

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Cleaned out ... egad, what a lot of spam :-(

> Almost 3 years worth ... not bad, actually ... 500 per year, less then 2 
> per day ... :)

Yeah ... the truly depressing thought is what an un-filtered mailbox
must look like these days :-(

I'm about ready to engage in vigilante action against spammers, myself.

			regards, tom lane