X-Original-To: pgsql-www-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74903A484E;
	Thu,  4 Nov 2004 14:57:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 88872-02; Thu,  4 Nov 2004 14:56:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073253A47FD;
	Thu,  4 Nov 2004 14:57:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iA4Ev1Kx025240;
	Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:57:02 -0500 (EST)
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>
Cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Inadequate hosting for www.postgresql.org 
In-reply-to: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306FBF@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
References: 
 <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306FBF@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
Comments: In-reply-to "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
	message dated "Thu, 04 Nov 2004 08:24:19 +0000"
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 09:57:01 -0500
Message-ID: <25239.1099580221@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200411/98
X-Sequence-Number: 5829

"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
> It's noticably faster from here now as well :-)

Great.  Now could someone check why cvsweb has gotten so dog-slow?
It's been bad for awhile, but just now it took order-of-a-minute to open
http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/

			regards, tom lane