Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkWOn-0006VT-6E for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:49:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkWOk-0003A9-Pe for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:49:34 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkWOk-00038L-FN for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:49:34 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkWOh-0000fB-Tn; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:49:33 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0IFnPPq025850; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:49:25 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Stephen Frost cc: Magnus Hagander , Dimitri Fontaine , Alvaro Herrera , Andres Freund , "Jonathan S. Katz" , PostgreSQL WWW Subject: Re: mailing list redirect for bug numbers? In-reply-to: <20190118154019.GP2528@tamriel.snowman.net> References: <201901162154.tg6vsmfylacs@alvherre.pgsql> <20190117154202.GH2528@tamriel.snowman.net> <20190117182821.GK2528@tamriel.snowman.net> <22663.1547759616@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190118143505.GN2528@tamriel.snowman.net> <24596.1547824622@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190118154019.GP2528@tamriel.snowman.net> Comments: In-reply-to Stephen Frost message dated "Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:40:19 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <25848.1547826565.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:49:25 -0500 Message-ID: <25849.1547826565@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Stephen Frost writes: > If we just agree to always use the message-ID of the first message in > the thread when we're closing out a bug, and people are happy with using > message-ID, then I'm not really sure what the bug # is doing for us (and > I see that that question from my prior email wasn't answered). Yeah, I'm coming to the conclusion that there's nothing worth changing here. In an ideal world we'd have a bug number for every bug, but we'd have to give up more than that's worth. regards, tom lane