Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ew8Os-0007Ca-2O for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:33:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ew8Or-00007n-1V for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:33:09 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ew8Oq-00006o-Sa for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:33:08 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ew8Om-0007qk-KS for pgsql-www@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:33:08 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w2EFWwoA027633; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:32:58 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: Stephen Frost , Magnus Hagander , PostgreSQL WWW Subject: Re: Bogus reports from coverage.postgresql.org In-reply-to: <5ca841a1-1506-fda0-6428-08e31c38c3f2@2ndquadrant.com> References: <30195.1520790475@sss.pgh.pa.us> <30669.1520791101@sss.pgh.pa.us> <31446.1520791925@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1594.1520795000@sss.pgh.pa.us> <2633.1520796277@sss.pgh.pa.us> <13148.1520798486@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20180313170105.GC2416@tamriel.snowman.net> <26015.1520963110@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5ca841a1-1506-fda0-6428-08e31c38c3f2@2ndquadrant.com> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:31:31 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <27630.1521041578.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:32:58 -0400 Message-ID: <27631.1521041578@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Peter Eisentraut writes: > On 3/13/18 13:45, Tom Lane wrote: >> Yeah. I'd written that off as too low-probability to worry about, >> but maybe not. I'll poke further. Peter, which lcov did you test? > lcov: LCOV version 1.13 > The one that comes with Debian stable, presumably the same that is > running on coverage.p.o. OK, now we're getting into the *really* low-probability cases. Like, maybe it's time to remove and reinstall lcov and/or gcc on that box? regards, tom lane