Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UGbWV-0002r9-Nx for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:46:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UGbWV-0002LE-7Z for pgsql-www@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:46:43 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UGbWU-0002L6-FI for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:46:42 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UGbWS-0007qW-BR for pgsql-www@postgresql.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:46:41 +0000 Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2FKkaNP028201; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:46:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom Lane To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: A plague of link spam ... In-reply-to: <514376C3.9060405@kaltenbrunner.cc> References: <24283.1363371381@sss.pgh.pa.us> <514376C3.9060405@kaltenbrunner.cc> Comments: In-reply-to Stefan Kaltenbrunner message dated "Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:30:11 +0100" Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:46:36 -0400 Message-ID: <28200.1363380396@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-www Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-www-owner@postgresql.org Stefan Kaltenbrunner writes: > On 03/15/2013 07:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> (I am only about one or two more spams away from >> summarily blocking all yahoo traffic from my own mail server, btw. >> They account for easily a third of all the spam I'm seeing lately.) > yeah abuse on yahoo accounts is really bad, but I don't think we can > block those in general... TBH, I think Yahoo doesn't give a damn about their spam problem because they think they're too big for anybody to block them. It's not going to get better until some people start to do so anyway. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www