Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3699F9298 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:09:26 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33059-06 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:09:25 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E3449F9297 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:09:25 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA323B46BB2 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:09:24 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61350-06; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:09:03 -0400 (AST) Received: from fserv.hub.org (blk-137-93-67.eastlink.ca [24.137.93.67]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EC0B46B5A; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:09:19 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by fserv.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95434D77B; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:09:22 -0400 (AST) Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:09:11 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: "Joshua D. Drake" cc: pgsql-www@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Reviewing ftp tree Message-ID: <283C20037B59605313EBDA15@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20071105155315.467ad335@scratch> References: <20071105153503.42358b12@scratch> <988F327DB3FBC671A32E56D7@ganymede.hub.org> <20071105155315.467ad335@scratch> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/126 X-Sequence-Number: 12904 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Monday, November 05, 2007 15:53:15 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake" wrote: > Well win64 and suse were to illustrate how the tree could expand over > time. You are right that we don't currently have win64, but with 8.3 we > support VC++ so we could in theory support win64 for 8.4. > > Secondly I have been playing with building SuSE rpms to keep that tree > up to date for older SuSE releases and I could see it extending from > there as well (for example postgresql 8.2 for Ubuntu Dapper). > > The real difference here is that binary is misleading as we have source > packages in there and it isn't really binary as much as just a package > repo. I'm not against it, just wanted to clarify what you were envisioning ... +1 from here ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHL7634QvfyHIvDvMRAoI/AJ9K5Ka+I16JNkv8Gm6FxbKu2S63IwCggF79 89IlkzhOfnWr6Nu3zGSoO9w= =VEN5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----